Nancy,
do you see anything in the PXE log?
Thanks,
Pascal.

Hi!

Nancy
It is so strange to hear because i am still getting the results for the process i send to you. Can you please recreate the process by seeing the example i had attached earlier and send that with schema and pxe log file.So that i can check where you are actually facing the problem.For you convenience i am again attaching the same n3x file.This diagram has been recreated in designer 4.1.3.016 and deployed in intalio-bpms-standalone-4.1.3

Thanks
Chandra:blush:

Hi Chandra,
Here is a Zip file containing the project built from your nx3 file. I still have the same problem (MessageExchange failure). I included the PXE log in the Zip but as you'll see there is not much in there...!
Thanks,

Nancy

Hi!

Nancy

I just went through your diagram.There is no issue in the process but the problem lies in sending the soap message.The soap that you created is not correct.Just check the difference given below regarding the soap message you created and the one I created:

You created the soap message as:

<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:int="http://www.intalio.com">
<soapenv:Body>
<int:AssignTask>
<Name>nancy</Name>
<JobProfile>toto</JobProfile>
<Status>statut</Status> </int:AssignTask>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

I have created the soap message as

<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:int="http://www.intalio.com">
<soapenv:Body>
<int:AssignTask>
<int:Name>nancy</int:Name>
<int:JobProfile>toto</int:JobProfile>
<int:Status>statut</int:Status>
</int:AssignTask>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

Note: The schema uses prefix as “ int” in Soap Envelope i.e :
xmlns:int="http://www.intalio.com"
Now when sending soap you need to attach this prefix with the complex schema as well as simple schema used within the complex schema in order to get correct result Thus in your scenario the server is not able to parse the schema due to which you are getting Message Exchange Failure
Thanks
Chandra

Hi Chandra,

You are absolutely right, it works fine now!
Now I wonder about 2 things regarding your process :
1) why do you need to initialize the response field with a literal before mapping it?
2) why is it required to use a variable that you create (a) ? isn't it possible to do a direct mapping from field to field?

Thanks very much,

Nancy

Hi!

Nancy

Yes direct mapping is possible. You can do one to one mapping for all the schemas but just keep in mind that you have to initialize the outgoing schema to literal.

Thanks

Chandra
;)